翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Wednesbury bus station
・ Wednesbury by-election, 1932
・ Wednesbury by-election, 1957
・ Wednesbury Central railway station
・ Wednesbury Charity Cup
・ Wednesbury Great Western Street tram stop
・ Wednesbury Museum and Art Gallery
・ Wednesbury Oak Loop
・ Wednesbury Old Athletic F.C.
・ Wednesbury Old Canal
・ Wednesbury Parkway tram stop
・ Wednesbury Rugby Club
・ Wednesbury Strollers F.C.
・ Wednesbury Town F.C.
・ Wednesbury Town railway station
Wednesbury unreasonableness in Singapore law
・ Wednesday
・ Wednesday (album)
・ Wednesday (band)
・ Wednesday (disambiguation)
・ Wednesday 13
・ Wednesday Addams
・ Wednesday Comics
・ Wednesday demonstration
・ Wednesday Is Indigo Blue
・ Wednesday Island
・ Wednesday Journal
・ Wednesday Martin
・ Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.
・ Wednesday Night Baseball


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Wednesbury unreasonableness in Singapore law : ウィキペディア英語版
Wednesbury unreasonableness in Singapore law

''Wednesbury'' unreasonableness is a ground of judicial review in Singapore administrative law. A governmental decision that is ''Wednesbury''-unreasonable may be quashed by the High Court. This type of unreasonableness of public body decisions was laid down in the English case of ''Associated Provincial Picture Houses v. Wednesbury Corporation'' (1947), where it was said that a public authority acts unreasonably when a decision it makes is "so absurd that no sensible person could ever dream that it lay within the powers of the authority". ''Wednesbury'' unreasonableness was subsequently equated with irrationality by the House of Lords in ''Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service'' (the ''GCHQ'' case, 1983). These cases have been applied numerous times in Singapore, though in some decisions it is not very clear whether the courts have applied such a stringent standard.
In the UK, courts have applied varying standards of scrutiny when assessing whether a governmental decision is ''Wednesbury''-unreasonable, depending on the subject matter and general context of the case. There do not appear to be any Singapore cases adopting an "anxious scrutiny" standard. On the other hand, a few cases can be said to have applied a "light touch" standard where questions of public order and security have arisen. There are suggestions in the UK that a doctrine of proportionality should supplant or be merged into the concept of ''Wednesbury'' unreasonableness; thus far, such an approach has not been taken up in Singapore. It is said that in holding that a decision is disproportionate, there is a higher danger that the court might be substituting its view for the decision-maker's.
==Development and application==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Wednesbury unreasonableness in Singapore law」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.